www.freakyplasticsurgery.com

On "The Insider" tonite, did you see the computerized "aged" photo of MJ without plastic surgery?

They did this computer adjusted photo of Michael using photos of how he looked before the plastic surgery showing how he possibly would've looked at age 50, had he not had skin bleaching and plastic surgery. Had sleeked combed back short hair. And he had great bone structure in this photo. Looked a lot like Billy dee Williams, and a little like Jermaine, but much better. Very handsome. Thank you for the correction, IloveMJ. I knew his skin lightening wasn't done for the reason of lightening his skin, but I was still thinking that he had some kind of medical treatments to even out his skin tone because of the problem. Maybe it was natural due to the vitiligo. I've heard since he died that he had lupus and that's why his skin had changed color because of treatments, but I never know what is the truth.

Public Comments

  1. I didn't see it on tv, but I know what you're talking about. It's ok though. I loved MJ just the way he was.
  2. alicab said it all
  3. He looked like my dad.
  4. Uhh, alright then? I never judged him for the way he looked. I see beyond that.
  5. yeah i saw it idk i didn't like it, tbh it just looked like some old guy. no offence.. but i prefered him with plastic surgery to that. without just didn't really look like the king of pop. he should of stopped at thriller though. he was gorgeous then (L) x x
  6. Michael was always handsome. Had he lived on longer, he would have still been handsome. Had he lived to be 3000 years old, he would have been very handsome. Because it was the kindness of Michael's heart that shone through his face. The love he had for the poor, how caring and loving he was. Michael said, 'when the beauty is inside, it shines on the outside'. Thats why all Michael Jackson fans will always think he looks beautifully handsome. Oh, and just to correct you on one little thing, he had a skin disease called Vitiligo. Medically PROVEN.
  7. That enhanced photo assumes that he would have retained his original color. He would not have been that color because he had vitiligo. If he had his skin lightened at all, it was probably to even the tone of his face and hands, his arms, legs and chest were splotchy, mainly lacking in pigment, but with blotches of what was left of his pigment. We won't really know for sure if he bleached his face because he wore so much makeup. If he hadn't done anything to his face at all, then the vitiligo would have left him with a face that was mostly without pigment, but with splotches on it. In any case, I think it's pretty useless for them to speculate on what he would have looked like without surgery anyway, it's his choice what he wanted to look like. Who or what is helped with such useless speculation?
Powered by Yahoo! Answers